@jaceklaskowski Haha! You're pushing this to see how far it'll go! ;)
-
-
Replying to @propensive
@propensive Yeah. It's so obvious once one gets it. Wish I managed types as much as values, though.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jaceklaskowski
@jaceklaskowski Well, the subtle difference between val x, y = (1, 2) and val (x, y) = (1, 2) isn't so obvious, unfortunately...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @propensive
@propensive That's why *I* enjoy#Scala = mental exercises. Think many would…throw up their hands in despair http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/throw-up-your-hands-in-horror-despair …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @propensive
@propensive How much of it is in http://rapture.io/ ? Would you recommend reading the sources to *master* Scala? Is the code idiomatic?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jaceklaskowski
@jaceklaskowski I use almost every feature *somewhere* in Rapture, but much of it isn't readable... :(1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @propensive
@jaceklaskowski Maybe that's unfair on my own code, but it's optimised heavily for the use sites at the expense of the definition sites.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @propensive
@jaceklaskowski I could certainly improve it with better comments on the weird stuff. Code with *uses* Rapture should be idiomatic, though.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @propensive
@propensive Wonder if such a "trade" is common or unavoidable - readable sources vs idiomatic use.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@jaceklaskowski You definitely don't always have that tradeoff. But often find yourself pushing complexity ("weirdness") to lower levels.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.