Oh, ok. I just solved it by reordering my type parameters.
-
@oferron Yeah, implicit parameters work like ordinary parameter *blocks* - evaluated in turn. My problem was with *type* parameters... :(
@oferron It's rare that a different order of implicit parameters will make a difference, but it does sometimes...
-
-
@propensive I know implicit are evaluated in blocks, but the order shouldn't matter. Or at least be consistent. -
@oferron But you can have one implicit that's resolved on a constraint introduced by a previous one.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.