Why do case classes extend Product but not ProductN? Do we *want* people to be forced to use macros/codegen for every little thing? =(
-
-
Replying to @propensive
@propensive It *needs* to be a macro, no "could" about it! There's no way of accessible the fields of a case class in a generic fashion.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @propensive
@propensive No you can't. You *could* if they inherited from ProductN, but they don't. That's my whole complaint =P1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.