Scala's `new` syntax is an anomaly. I'd rather say `new[Foo](x, y, z)`, or just `new(x, y, z)` if `Foo` is the expected type.
-
@extempore2 Also, sarcasm. Anyway, did you have any particular construction abstractions in mind?
@extempore2 Anything smarter than case class factories, which is the extent of my imagination right now.
-
-
@propensive@extempore2 `new` implemented via a macro that inspects type parameters?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.