Scala's `new` syntax is an anomaly. I'd rather say `new[Foo](x, y, z)`, or just `new(x, y, z)` if `Foo` is the expected type.
-
@propensive TBH I am more and more against `new` at all, since it precludes instance reuse. (i.e. only makes sense for mutability)
@viktorklang Particular thing that gets me is the precedence of dot vs space in, e.g., `new Foo().bar`.
-
-
@viktorklang Which, of course, is different from `new http://Foo.bar `!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@propensive Oh yes! I still, out of habit and expecation, always surround it with its paren(t)s. `(new Foo).bar` -
@viktorklang Yeah, that's nice and unambiguous. Just seems a bit clunky... - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.