Scala's `new` syntax is an anomaly. I'd rather say `new[Foo](x, y, z)`, or just `new(x, y, z)` if `Foo` is the expected type.
-
@propensive TBH I am more and more against `new` at all, since it precludes instance reuse. (i.e. only makes sense for mutability)
@viktorklang Yeah, I just meant the syntax; `new` itself is another story. But there needs to be some way to create new objects, right?
-
-
@propensive Yes, but it need not be a keyword at all, since it is "just" about using the memory subsystem. :)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.