@DRMacIver Yes, good point. But do you want more or less tolerance? I've seen a lot of criticism that Scalaz is too tolerant.
-
-
Replying to @propensive
@propensive The answer is "it's complicated". Tolerance isn't a scalar it's a vector, and *what* you tolerate matters.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DRMacIver
@DRMacIver Yeah, I completely agree. And the fact it's complicated isn't always understood.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @propensive
@propensive It's also sometimes hard to see who you're excluding by what you tolerate because they're by definition not there.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DRMacIver
@DRMacIver Yes. And also easy to hypothesize who it is, correctly or otherwise.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @propensive
@propensive I have noticed more than a few people saying they avoid Scalaz and similar communities for exactly this reason FWIW.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DRMacIver
@DRMacIver People argue that@dibblego is a reason to avoid Scalaz. I just don't like that argument being extended to the whole community.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @propensive
@DRMacIver@dibblego I'm sure Tony is perfectly happy to take criticism if that's the reason. There are tons of others who don't deserve it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @propensive
@DRMacIver@dibblego Sure. Though in Scalaz's case, I think it was pretty easy to avoid Tony. He was banned from most places.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @propensive
@propensive as I said, I haven't paid that much attention to this specific case and am not commenting on it, only the general principle1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@DRMacIver Sure, I appreciate that!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.