@alexcruise @propensive @d6 @n8han @viktorklang that's what he said: arbitrary :)
-
-
Replying to @dcsobral
@dcsobral of course, with an orbital period of ~365.2422 days, some corrections are necessary. /cc@propensive@d6@n8han@viktorklang1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexcruise
@dcsobral also note that Earth's rotation isn't exactly 24h but we can't redeclare H/M/S as var. :) /cc@propensive@d6@n8han@viktorklang1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexcruise
@alexcruise@propensive@d6@n8han@viktorklang besides, do what Java 8 does: make seconds longer or shorter. Nobody cares besides scientist1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dcsobral
@dcsobral WAT /cc@propensive@d6@n8han@viktorklang1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexcruise
@alexcruise@dcsobral@d6@n8han@viktorklang It would take decades before anyone noticed wall-clock time didn't match the stars.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @propensive
@alexcruise@dcsobral@d6@n8han@viktorklang Why not just have a leap-minute every century or so? Can't be worse than Y2K, for example!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @propensive
@alexcruise@dcsobral@d6@n8han@viktorklang People who care about seconds probably need to be aware of this too: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Leapsecond.ut1-utc.svg …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @propensive
@alexcruise@dcsobral@d6@n8han@viktorklang So it's hardly as if leap seconds solve the "problem" anyway... ;)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @propensive
@propensive I was going to ask Quora about leap second pros and cons but found http://www.timeanddate.com/time/leap-seconds-future.html … /cc@dcsobral@d6@n8han@viktorklang1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@alexcruise Good to see an old lecturer of mine making a balanced argument! /cc @dcsobral @d6 @n8han @viktorklang
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.