-
-
Replying to @propensive
@propensive Isn't this the same? type +[X[_],Y[_]] = Either[X[F],Y[F]] forSome {type F}1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @propensive
@propensive@larsr_h I can't help thinking that that existential spells doom though.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @milessabin
@milessabin@larsr_h Agreed. I think it's impossible to write a type of kind (* -> *) -> * -> * without one, though...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @propensive
@propensive@milessabin@larsr_h In that case it could be worth raising on dotty-internals, given that existentials are on their way out1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @thecoda
@thecoda @milessabin @larsr_h AIUI (which I probably don't) I'd have more than lack of existentials to contend with in Dotty...
1:51 AM - 21 Feb 2014
from Tower Hamlets, England
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.