How about, as a step towards better type class support in Scala, we substitute "implicitly" with the empty string? Does that parse?
-
-
Replying to @propensive
@propensive scalaz already does that. Summon a `Functor` just by writing `Functor[List]`.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @propensive
@propensive Oh, right. Not sure if that'd introduce ambiguities.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @larsr_h
@larsr_h This I wonder... ;)
5:03 AM - 29 Nov 2013
from Tower Hamlets, England
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.