Maven and SBT seem so baroque that I'm actually considering using Ant to deploy Rapture I/O to Sonatype. Yes, Ant.
-
-
@psnively I normally use Make, just because it's simple. I'm open to other ideas, but only (selfishly) once they reach critical mass...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @deanwampler
@deanwampler Many things in Make can be harder than SBT/Maven, but there's a lot to be said for understanding how it actually works...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @propensive
@propensive@deanwampler "Knowing how it works" is a rather subjective measure. :)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @martiell
@martiell@deanwampler Sure, but how little I understand about SBT and Maven is less subjective. ;)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @propensive
@propensive@martiell Yes, being able to compose my own targets and rules is why I use make for everything except for Scala projects.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @deanwampler
@deanwampler@propensive I use maven for much the same reason. :) I get by in make, but I find debugging maven builds easier than make.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @martiell
@martiell@propensive I prefer to roll my own build rules rather than wrestle with XML and difficult extensibility. Knowing bash helps ;)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@deanwampler @martiell I think Make is fundamentally simpler than Maven, but the one you know will always be more powerful.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.