Fair warning... this is a question involving opinions about whitespace. How should I start writing an type-parameterized extension method in Scala 3?
-
Because usually other keywords for definitions are followed by an identifier. It feels weird to have the dangling type parameter with spaces around it.
-
-
Right. Which is why my best guess is that when given choice, users generally opt for the less effort choice, thus the no spaces option.
-
To be fair I like the point other commenters have made: whatever scalafmt picks is good: uniformity (see Python's black, go's fmt) helps a lot
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.