If Scala 3.1 adopts checked exceptions, I'm looking forward to the day when I can declare a library method as, def foo: Bar throws E without worrying whether my users care about exceptions or not. Right now I must return either `Bar` or `Try[Bar]` and make _someone_ compromise.
-
-
The problem to solve there, IMO, is that switching to for-comprehension style is painstaking.
-
Monadless does exist but I don't think it's widely used
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.