I would certainly encourage everyone to avoid answering impulsively. After being dragged into a conversation I didn't want to be in just over a week ago, I can recommend against impulsive answers.
-
-
But what would failure look like? A segregated community where people don't, can't or won't agree, where there's no pushback against mutual antagonism, and one where nobody actually cares about it any more because they've given up?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
I still care about it because it's not the welcoming community I want to be a part of. There were huge efforts made to make functional programming more welcoming to newcomers, particularly minorities, and that's a value I want to uphold and encourage.
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes -
Right now, there seems to be a general lack of awareness about how offputting a community dominated by angry, middle-aged, white men looks. Sure, I'm all of those things too. But I'd like people to say least have some hope that it doesn't have to be this way.
4 replies 1 retweet 14 likes -
Replying to @propensive @alexelcu
What I don't understand is what you are expecting from libraries authors affected by the "aggressive marketing". They can be nice and fight marketing with facts but it gets tiring. Eventually they either give up or fight back. Both are bad but you can't blame authors.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Well, I don't think I or anyone else should be surprised when someone promotes or defends something they have devoted time and effort to. There's nothing surprising about Raúl defending against perceived criticism of Cats, or John pushing his own libraries and ideas.
6 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
To be fair, it's a bit surprising (ok maybe not entirely surprising, but certainly extenuating) to constantly push your own ideas at the expenses of others. It's entirely possible to promote something you have devoted time and effort to without bringing everything else down.
1 reply 1 retweet 22 likes -
Replying to @gabro27 @propensive and
I think this is the crucial bit that upsets people (including myself) the most: just promote your stuff without declaring everything else as inferior and obsolete. This is the sane behavior most people in the Scala community already have and the few notable exceptions stand out.
3 replies 3 retweets 45 likes -
It's what I try to do, but I also know it's extremely hard to get traction for a technically better solution when there's an incumbent. I have been particularly aware of this with trying to promote Magnolia "agnostically" when everyone else's frame of reference is Shapeless...
4 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @propensive @gabro27 and
I understand the difficulty, but I think the point is: if you take the easy way out to crap on everybody else’s work to promote your own, you shouldn’t be surprised when everybody else gets upset. It is, after all, part of the process.
1 reply 2 retweets 15 likes
Yes, I am not suprised that people get upset about things they've devoted time and effort to. But the innocent bystanders, would benefit much more from some magnanimity on both sides. But people are inherently selfish. I know I am.
-
-
Replying to @propensive @gabro27 and
It could be argued that this sort of public meltdown is good. We’re a community that tolerates this kind of behaviour (it does happen every few months). Let’s acknowledge it, so that newcomers know what they’re getting into. Or fix it. But not just... sort of hide it.
1 reply 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @NicolasRinaudo @propensive and
In short: either it’s ok, and we stop making a fuss. Or it’s not, and we fix it. But it’s not both, and straddling that line is counterproductive, regardless of your personal preference.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.