Would you like a unified, "healed" community? Wishful thinking and "peace on earth" type thoughts don't help. Dismissing the bad experience of others doesn't help either. What helps is growing a pair and calling out bullies.https://twitter.com/raulraja/status/1289967477653307392 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @alexelcu
I'm not sure why you say that. Plenty of disagreements have been solved because the people involved sat down and had a reasoned talk about them. You've forgotten them because they came to nothing, and people got on with things. So this message feels unnecessarily incendiary.
1 reply 0 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @propensive
Plenty of disagreements have been solved by sitting down and talking things through, yes, but bullying isn't mere disagreement, esp when the same pattern of behavior keeps repeating, and it's ridiculous to ask victims to sit down and solve differences.
1 reply 0 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @alexelcu
It may be futile to hope that some differences can ever be resolved, though I prefer to try. But we shouldn't call marketing claims (and here I'm deliberately taking no opinion on them) "bullying" either, even if they're tiresome and bogus... unless you saw something I didn't?
3 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @propensive
You can try, I've always admired you for that, but unless the aggressor stops being an aggressor, at some point it becomes victim blaming. The repeated bullying behavior should be obvious, but I'll shut up, lest I might get a cease and desist letter
2 replies 0 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @alexelcu
The best cease and desist letter is the one that doesn't even need to be sent... ;) But seriously, there's so much nuance in the interpretation of various tweets that in the case of
@jdegoes, everyone should at least be very precise in their criticisms.2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
There is so much ill-will and mixed context that it's very easy to characterize "aggressive marketing" as "bullying" or "disagreement" as "arguing". If anything, I'd encourage people to be focused in every reply, because there's a wide gray area that's exacerbating the problem.
1 reply 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @propensive
I'm no longer interested in gray areas or giving him the benefit of the doubt, sorry. That ship has sailed. I guess I'm doing some "aggressive marketing" and "arguing" right now too, and will continue to do so
Please don't bring him again in my mentions.2 replies 0 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @alexelcu
Specifically, if someone says something unfairly critical of Cats, don't call it "bullying" because that's a different, categorically ad-hominem thing. It undermines the argument against John and it undermines actual bullying when it happens.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @propensive
Except when John says something critical of Cats, it can very well be that he has an axe to grind. His opinions on technology correlate with his ongoing conflicts or partnership ambitions. And when he screws up, he then deletes his online traces, after the damage was done.
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes
I haven't noticed this happening before (and I'm not even sure of the mechanism, but wouldn't notice anyway, probably), but isn't it akin to someone who pre-blocks every possible person who might dissent so that their tweets appear to have a universally positive reaction?
-
-
Replying to @propensive
You mean, what John is doing? (this gem has since been deleted btw)pic.twitter.com/eODZzaiesQ
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @alexelcu
Maybe, though that seems like a more recent change in tactics.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.