I'm not sure why you say that. Plenty of disagreements have been solved because the people involved sat down and had a reasoned talk about them. You've forgotten them because they came to nothing, and people got on with things. So this message feels unnecessarily incendiary.
-
-
Replying to @propensive
Plenty of disagreements have been solved by sitting down and talking things through, yes, but bullying isn't mere disagreement, esp when the same pattern of behavior keeps repeating, and it's ridiculous to ask victims to sit down and solve differences.
1 reply 0 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @alexelcu
It may be futile to hope that some differences can ever be resolved, though I prefer to try. But we shouldn't call marketing claims (and here I'm deliberately taking no opinion on them) "bullying" either, even if they're tiresome and bogus... unless you saw something I didn't?
3 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @propensive
You can try, I've always admired you for that, but unless the aggressor stops being an aggressor, at some point it becomes victim blaming. The repeated bullying behavior should be obvious, but I'll shut up, lest I might get a cease and desist letter
2 replies 0 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @alexelcu
The best cease and desist letter is the one that doesn't even need to be sent... ;) But seriously, there's so much nuance in the interpretation of various tweets that in the case of
@jdegoes, everyone should at least be very precise in their criticisms.2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
There is so much ill-will and mixed context that it's very easy to characterize "aggressive marketing" as "bullying" or "disagreement" as "arguing". If anything, I'd encourage people to be focused in every reply, because there's a wide gray area that's exacerbating the problem.
1 reply 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @propensive
I'm no longer interested in gray areas or giving him the benefit of the doubt, sorry. That ship has sailed. I guess I'm doing some "aggressive marketing" and "arguing" right now too, and will continue to do so
Please don't bring him again in my mentions.2 replies 0 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @alexelcu
I wasn't talking about giving anyone the benefit of the doubt (I know that's lost already) and the gray areas are very much on both sides. I'm saying the opposite: be precise in your criticism so you are not misinterpreted by the people you need to convince.
3 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @propensive @alexelcu
This is not fair. Alex is has been very precise in his criticism in the past. It's disheartening to see every discussion with you boiling down to you telling the other person to be better. This is particularly bad when you read your own approach to criticize him.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
In the very first reply you told Alex that he forgot episodes, which you can't possibly know, why he forgot them, which again you can't tell and that the message was incendiary. So much for being precise. Again, I can't tell you how unfair some of your comments feel.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
The "you forgot them" claim in my first response was meant to be a very general "you" in the sense that I was alluding to survivor bias. I could have been *much* clearer, I agree.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.