If you can point to anywhere I’ve called De Goes a Nazi or white supremacist, I’ll happily apologize. Not even the cease and desist letter accuses me of that. I’ve said he has a long history of platforming and defending them, because he does.
I'm talking about the "Nazi apologists" claim in your profile. Who are they? Damian called me a nazi in response to you a couple of weeks ago, and you said nothing. Why not? Convenience?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yarvin in 2010-11: "Cannot we marvel at what the Third Reich achieved…?", "If you ask me to condemn Anders Breivik… perhaps you have a mother you’d like to fuck.", etc. De Goes in 2016-17: "[Yarvin] has never written any hate speech", "[Yarvin] is not a white supremacist."
- Show replies
-
-
-
Assuming Yarvin is a Nazi - and there's ample evidence for that - and I define "nazi apologist" as anyone defending a Nazi, then yes, by modus pollens John is a Nazi apologist based on his claim that "Yarvin has never engaged with hate speech".
-
Now, for the court record (since we're all suing each other now) - *I* don't claim that John is a Nazi apologist. But I claim that the above logic is valid, and that the conclusion *of that logic* is that John is a nazi apologist. If you dont like it, prove the logic wrong.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
So, an immediate backtrack from your position. That doesn't bode well for your argument.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
loooooooooooooooooool
-
"why didn't you tell that one person not to call me a nazi that time?" is going to be hard for these people to beat for long-lasting comedy value
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.