And I agree with you on the sexism part - it's pretty clear. But the racism part I don't see how to make the leaps you're making. There must be some background I'm missing. I'm not minimizing the harm paulp's comments cause.
-
Well, thank you for saying that, too—equally, you didn't have to. What I would like is for the light to be shone in the right place. I know I have a much more positive view of the makeup of the community than
@posco or@travisbrown, and I get frustrated that so much attention...
...goes on certain people, and it actually distracts from more egregious examples in broader definitions of community and society. I'm certainly privileged to have spent long enough with Paul and others to know them well enough to make these judgements, though not everyone has.
-
-
I see your point about undue attention to individuals. Honestly, a part of me feels weird that I'm still talking about LC several years past the incident. But to me, it's not about a single person, but figuring out what general principle would prevent such incidents in the future
-
Imo what LC did was break an implicit assumption of shared values - part of the community expected that a CoC would be interpreted in a way that would preclude Moldbug, and another part expected the reverse.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.