I’m happy to share Wayback Machine links for the race science stuff if you think there’s nuance I’ve omitted.
-
-
Replying to @travisbrown @posco and
I'm not aware of any of Paulp's past aside from his Scala rants. What I have to go on are the tweets in front of me, which are explainable as "edgelord co-opts the rhetorical style of bigots and race-baiting trolls to invite debate". I'd like to see more if you have it.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I don't think that's an "explanation", though, in any justifying sense. He's an adult with a central place in the community (if only because of his scalac contributions), and I know specific, real people who have left or avoided the community because of this kind of behavior.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @travisbrown @posco and
Emily Pillmore Retweeted Emily Pillmore
I'm not justifying anything, just offering a view that I also happen to disagree with. See: https://twitter.com/pitopos/status/1271139084413648896 … I think it's manipulative, emotionally stunted, and not at all productive. I don't know how to be more clear than that that it's not okay.
Emily Pillmore added,
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bkmlep @travisbrown and
This conversation tree is also getting very complicated. I'm happy to continue in a separate one.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
In any case here's the link for the brain size tweets. I know people who are likely to have more comprehensive lists of links like this—I'll ask around. In the meantime if you want to defend his shit any more please untag me.http://web.archive.org/web/20180419191607/https:/twitter.com/contrarivariant/status/987047197605748736 …
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @travisbrown @posco and
Tech is hard enough without being accused of defending racists and sexists. I experience it every day. You don't have to level that shit against me for asking, and I don't have the privilege of free time to spend on this. So please, if there is background, I'd like to see it.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
What “background” do you mean? I’ve posted the screenshots and links I have at hand, which are fairly self-contained and explanatory, and I’ve said I’ll ask around for more. Also sure, maybe “defend” isn’t the right word, I should have said “minimize” or “downplay”, I guess.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @travisbrown @posco and
And I agree with you on the sexism part - it's pretty clear. But the racism part I don't see how to make the leaps you're making. There must be some background I'm missing. I'm not minimizing the harm paulp's comments cause.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @bkmlep @travisbrown and
@pitopos I've never heard of Paul until now, and I can't do a proper check of his account since he deleted it, but just that one tweet that Travis posted made me go YIKES. The rabbit hole you're looking for will open by the keyword "Human Biodiversity"pic.twitter.com/41Vj55MV6r
2 replies 1 retweet 8 likes
I've been friend of Paul's for several years, and I will make the assertion that he's not racist. If I thought he were, I wouldn't entertain a continued friendship with him. I will gladly put up with him being obnoxious (to me, at least) but not racist.
-
-
Replying to @propensive @tangled_zans and
I will also assert that he can be his own worst enemy in trusting that "facts speak for themselves". I've spoken to him specifically about that tweet, because it leans far too heavily either on context which most people don't have, or some amount of charity.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @propensive @tangled_zans and
I know that his issue is with his perception of Google's censorship. He has ranted to me ad nauseum about it. He's made it very clear to me that he has zero interest in the actual search query, and 100% interest in illustrating Google's manipulation of search results.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.