I call it a "frenzy" because it's grown from a couple of perfectly valid criticisms of John about five years ago, into desires to "kick him out of the community". In the intervening years John has certainly irked many people, but he hasn't repeated any offense of the same nature.
-
Show this thread
-
"Disagreements" may sound like downplaying them. But that's how they were seen at the time. Those who disagreed with John in 2015 still talked with him in 2016; still went to events with him in 2017. It's as if the more time passes without incident, the harsher the condemnation.
1 reply 1 retweet 28 likesShow this thread -
An example is the oft-repeated claim that he invited a racist speaker to LambdaConf. This is a gradual escalation of the reality: a racist speaker was accepted by blind review and was not removed. Repeated enough times people, start to believe it. Where have you seen that before?
2 replies 0 retweets 36 likesShow this thread -
But it's become obsessive because it paints John as the most tangible icon in our community for many of the rancid ideas that good people want to distance themselves from. Those ideas are precisely as bad as the ever were. It's just that John was never a proponent of them.
1 reply 0 retweets 27 likesShow this thread -
And everyone should attack racist and sexist ideas. They don't have a place in the Scala community or anywhere. But we don't defeat bad ideas by attributing them to the nearest lightning rod and attacking him as if he's a valid personification of them, when really he's not.
1 reply 1 retweet 38 likesShow this thread -
I've seen it suggested John is a "Nazi-sympathizer" recently. This is bad enough, but what saddens me more is seeing people I respect, and who know better replying, liking, but passing over the chance to offer a correction; out of convenience. It's a first-degree lie of omission.
1 reply 0 retweets 36 likesShow this thread -
Instead, attack the ideas themselves. Argue against racism, against sexism. Argue against homophobia and transphobia. If you're employing such weak proxies for those things as John de Goes, your zeal is doing a disservice to your cause. It is not getting you closer to your goals.
1 reply 1 retweet 38 likesShow this thread -
People have asked me before, "why defend John?" My goal is not to defend John. I only want to do what I can to uphold the values I believe are important in the Scala community. For me, that means condemning any injustice to
@Ryan_Signify or John, and equally to Jamie Allen too.3 replies 2 retweets 46 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @propensive @Ryan_Signify
I don't think thread is an accurate recollection of what occurred. You present moldbug @ LC as causing a small "disagreement", but this made the press (e.g. http://Inc.com and boingboing both reported it.)
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
I don't see a meaningful difference between inviting a racist speaker and not rescinding that invitation once you become aware they are racist. Your wording suggests that LC was never aware of who moldbug was, which is false.
2 replies 0 retweets 10 likes
Maybe there's not a huge meaningful difference, but the problem is this moral equivalence gets applied more than once. Is there a meaningful difference between inviting one racist speaker and inviting five?
-
-
Is there a difference between a conference with five racist speakers, and a racist conference? Is there a difference between an organiser of a racist conference and a racist organiser of a conference? IS there a difference between a racist organiser and a nazi?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This sort of repeated application of moral equivalence turns a supposedly-meaningless difference into something significant, and the greying of the lines between them serves nobody's interests. I want to stick to facts, and John did not invite any racist speaker to LambdaConf.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.