Here's a Scala 3 feature suggestion: I'd like to write for-comprehensions which know their generator type, like so: for[List] { x <- xs y <- ys } yield ... It would make it much easier to work out whether `xs` or `ys` is the wrong type.
-
-
Absolutely! Plus, even if you'd liberally sum up simplifications–there is still more stuff that's new and complex than stuff that has been simplified or removed. Scala-the-language was best with Paul; focus and quality have been on an increasingly rapid decline since Paul left.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It should not be too simple. For people wanting that there are too many alternatives like Kotlin, Java, Python and JS.
-
I think that's a false comparison. The desire to avoid _needless_ complexity is completely different from wanting powerful features and accepting the required complexity in return. I wouldn't say that any of the languages you mentioned rate well on avoiding needless complexity.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.