No, he creates chaos and inconsistency in a consistent way.
I always thought that geopolitically, he's happy to maintain global inconsistencies (as opposed to Western leaders who prefer global black and white certainty), and evaluate them only when needed. So, what's a lazy, dynamic language?
-
-
-
What did you have in mind?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.