If I'm read the situation correctly, and knowing who @scala_the is, I think that they feel like the original tweet—which labels a member of the community "toxic" after they make a joke (and even includes a winking emoji)—creates unnecessary ill-feeling in the community.
-
-
Replying to @propensive @brianclapper and
i didn't read the tweet as a joke,
@LiquidSloshalot didn't either, and wanted to protect those who wouldn't read it as a joke.@jdegoes hasn't done anything about but issue platitudes, never apologized for his behaviors, so we can't stop trying to protect others from him.3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @arosien @brianclapper and
But I'm not sure how else to read it... I'm not an expert at emojis, but there's are two at the end: I think the first one means "I'm being evil," which, by its very nature implies a lack of seriousness because people don't admit it when they're genuinely evil, and the second...
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @propensive @arosien and
... is a sarcasm smiley which has been in use for decades, and whose meaning isn't in doubt. I really don't know how anyone can take this as anything other than whimsy. Imagine the tweet without the emojis, and that's a different story: they make a material difference.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @propensive @arosien and
There's a legitimate concern that even as a joke, the implied "truth" in the implication that the point is so obvious it deserves ridicule, can be made. But I think it would be overconfident to treat this nuance as the main intent.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @propensive @arosien and
I don't give people the benefit of the doubt with "jokes" like this. I see a lot of casual bigotry expressed as "jokes" that cloud their underlying intent with emojis and "it's just a joke" responses. I think in this case what matters isn't intent but how it's understood.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @LiquidSloshalot @propensive and
The conversation I'd like to be having w.r.t. these kinds of statements is how they affect people, not whether or not the people they affect are just "trying to be offended" (because, usually, nobody is).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LiquidSloshalot @propensive and
In my case - I have had accusations thrown my way of me favoring certain techniques or styles so as to make them impossible for anybody to figure out, on purpose, so it hurts to see people justifying those kinds of statements as "jokes" when that sentiment can be very real.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @LiquidSloshalot @propensive and
The end result is plausible deniability of ever having hurt anybody. You make a "joke", people who are offended are just butthurt, and the people who earnestly believe what you just said continue doing so. It doesn't help anybody.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @LiquidSloshalot @propensive and
+1 "Whatsamatta, can't you take a joke?" is one of the oldest and lamest ways to avoid taking responsibility for a rude or offensive comment.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
It's only me who's said "can't you take a joke?", not @jdegoes. But I think that if you come up with guidelines then they must be applied consistently, and I know plenty of people who've said equally-bad things in jest (us included) and I don't think they should be admonished.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.