It's astounding how much documentation (tutorials and blogs) there is out there for Java classes which just doesn't mention anywhere which package they're in... :(
-
-
-
Replying to @FelixMulder
Oh, you mean people copy/paste the code, and the IDE just adds the "obvious" imports? This totally explains why *I* don't get it!
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @propensive @FelixMulder
I share the same feeling, and yes, that’s my understanding as well: people are so used to using IDEs for Java that example authors completely ignore any other use case. Metals will soon be able to help, I think ^^
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @gabro27 @FelixMulder
You mean that Metals will make it worse for Scala documentation too?! :D
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @propensive @FelixMulder
absolutely what I meant
Jokes aside, I’m quite happy that many Scala projects have gotten into the habit of type checking the examples, which is the opposite of the Java situation.1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
Yes, I think @tpolecat's Tut is the one single reason why I'm complaining more about Java examples than Scala examples...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.