Some contrarian advice for job candidates: don't try to improve your interview technique. If you're genuinely a good candidate, it shouldn't be in your interests to be hired by a company that would be easily fooled by anything so superficial as "good interview technique".
I think that if it refered to an historically-oppressed race instead, it might be. It's a significant difference.
-
-
I disagree that it's a significant difference, unless we redefine racism. Meaning, it might be worse in practice but only by combination. E.g. it's worse to kick someone that stubbed their toe than someone else but either way kicking is intrinsically bad, that's not what changed
-
Also, "historically" is way too broad
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.