How about using `tacit` instead of `implied` for Scala 3's new "implicit" syntax?
-
where's neither? renaming a confusing thing to a synonym doesn't achieve anything
The third answer was meant to be a joke, but is effectively that. ;) But the reasoning is that the implicits system has changed considerably in Scala 3, and while it's an evolution, the concept is sufficiently different to warrant different names. I don't have strong feelings.
-
-
Did they really? You may not mention the specific evaluation strategy (which is not good, what about lazy val?) but it's still implicitly set.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
`implied for F[A] { .. }` is the new syntax right? `instance F[A] where { ... }` is more clear, or `evidence F[A] { ... }`
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.