Whoa, the Dotty extension method syntax has gotten all goofy: 
def (c: Circle) circumference: Double
instead of the C# style
def circumference(this c: Circle) : Double
-
I had some additional rationale that the definition can happily *look* different from what we're familiar with because it *is* something different from what we're familiar with.
I was actually in favour of replacing "apply" methods with `def (args): Type`, too.
-
-
Hmm, that's interesting. But again I can't fathom a world where a $50 syntax novelty is preferred to a $1 naming convention
-
Why $50, though? Shouldn't it be free because it's uniform? And it's only a novelty in the context of Scala 2's existing syntax... ;)
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
And what about right associative operators? def (x: B)::[B >: A]: List[B] You know you want to.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Don't forget the
@alpha("apply") for interop.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.