Ok, so I'd agree that the equivalence of my Brexit example to @fpmortals's situation might have been a stretch. But what about when you can reasonably predict the expected outcome of that third option of fighting for justice?
-
And this is perhaps you make this suggestion, because you don't see this something. Say to someone who is victim of abuse of power for his words to stop to say what he say can be seem as outrageous.
Essentially what I said was, "the way you are saying things, people are misinterpreting you, and you could say these things differently so that they are less likely to." That's a bit more nuanced than the way it's paraphrased in your tweet, though.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
+1 to editing. But I think that making the point about downvotes was what tipped the balance it into a ban this time, and you could have just not said that... but I honestly don't know why it was considered ban-worthy at all.
End of conversation
-
-
-
What happened was not a misinterpreting, but was a abuse of power. And what
@fommil demonstrate is part of scala "core" community are not so inclusive, welcoming or benevolent as they pretend to be. -
what i see in scala community is a lot of passive agressiveness, projection etc... That start with the king Odersky (that say publicly that scalaz entire community was troll).
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.