How would you know, have you recruited for moderators in enough capacity to handle situations like the above in competent manner? Where are the calls for applications? Where is your documented moderator process? It's easy to sit in an armchair and repeat "too hard, can't be done"
-
-
Replying to @PLT_cheater @propensive and
it's especially easy to blame nebulous difficulties and human failings when it's a convenient excuse for the continued dysfunction of an organisation which is given considerable power in the community. Which I am saying you are doing right now, just to be clear.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @PLT_cheater @ugobourdon and
Which organisation are you talking about here? I think the only organisation involved was Reddit...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @propensive @PLT_cheater and
Anyway, I tried to say this before, but I'm not defending the actions of the moderators. I'm explaining why we shouldn't be surprised that things like this happen. I don't know how Reddit choose moderators.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @propensive @ugobourdon and
your rationalization isn't true. I've been running online communities for a couple decades, and every time something like this happens, someone who has no experience in this pops up and starts throwing around exactly the arguments you have been using. They're red herrings.
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @PLT_cheater @propensive and
The truth of the matter is that most people who run into this sort of problem haven't put the least amount of effort into researching how to run an online community - a problem that's been looked into for the last 40 years. All the issues you bring up can be prevented or undone.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PLT_cheater @propensive and
So what is left is shoving blame on generic issues that apply to any problem in life: "no time" applies to being a mod as much as to doing laundry. If you have dirty boxers piling up then "no time" is a cop out. It's not a better argument when applied to mods misbehaving.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PLT_cheater @ugobourdon and
Maybe I'm distracting from the worthwhile goal of achieving excellence in forum moderation. But until we have excellence, I'm saying that it's in @fpmortals's best interests to use a different tone, because people are getting annoyed, even though I think they're wrong to.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @propensive @PLT_cheater and
And I made the point that he can choose to do this or not, but if he cares more about the points he's making, he has to abide by the evident way in which the forum he chooses to speak in is being run. If he wants to fix the forum, he can make that his cause instead.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @propensive @PLT_cheater and
Are you arguing same for Snowden for example ?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I don't know enough about Snowden's case. But I'm certainly not looking for a universal answer to all questions that can be framed in this way because I think that would be simplistic. There's inherent complexity whatever stretches of moral equivalence might beguile us otherwise.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.