You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I think it's too difficult to say what are "established norms", and we shouldn't pretend they're so very clear, and I think a goal of the moderators is to establish norms. It's a norm of society in general is that if someone annoys you frequently, you spend less time with them.
And people were annoyed by the nature and repetition of some things @fpmortals said in various forums. (And I'm deliberately choosing a weak reason here, because I believe it's highly nuanced, and it's no more than annoyance.) So the ban is the blunt tool to be less annoyed.
But I'll say again that I'm not trying to justify the ban. I don't think it was deserved, and I don't find @fpmortals anywhere near as annoying as other people seem to, but they had reasons for banning them, and I want people to understand them even if they don't agree with them.
This makes sense. It's hard to ford a way path where everyone is happy if one side believes their account is 100% correct, though. I cannot know, Mike's version of events, and to be gaslit and assumed a liar speaking in bad faith puts me in an impossible to win scenario
I think it's pretty much the decision of one individual to turn the sub-reddit from being a place to talk about Scala into a "Scala community" forum, with the associated ideology requirements, membership checks and policies on punishing unapproved opinions.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
