I think this is failing to understand, once again, that people simply don't behave as perfect, omniscient, objective moral arbiters. They simply get tired of things they perceive as negative, regardless of whether they're justified or factual. https://t.co/5NY8UOPCi6
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It doesn't give you many options for dialogue if you don't know who they are... but I think that's just one more reason why it's not worth the effort of trying to make a stand, especially in this domain where it's *so easy* to be misinterpreted. You can be right and still lose.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @propensive
I think that for most people, the ban doesn't affect them nearly as much as it affects you, so they're less likely to care. But then they read the follow-up tweet-storm, and they get a "bad feeling" (that's all it takes) and probably just feel the moderators were right all along.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @propensive
It's fast and loose reasoning, which doesn't stand up to critique, but there is no critique, so it doesn't matter. They get on with their lives, and you end up looking worse. Everyone loses.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Who do you mean by "the wookie"? But my advice, if you reduce it to something so simplistic it's borderline false*, to a) the moderators is, "let the person you want to ban win" and, b) everyone else is "let the moderators win".
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
* the same move people always play, whenever it's convenient.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.