I know it's a comparison of extremes, but compiling Fury using Bloop is approaching 10x faster than with scalac. Using fsc is closer to Bloop's performance, but still 2-3x slower.
-
-
Replying to @propensive
Wait, how? You mean on a hot compiler persisted by Bloop, I suppose. I wouldn’t expect any differences when using cold compilers
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @gabro27
I should have explained... building Fury is a multiphase process, and I'm invoking scalac over twenty times. Each time it has to start from fresh, loading a monotonically-growing classpath.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @propensive @gabro27
The comparison is with a cold bloop, though.
3:34 AM - 3 Jan 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.