I know it's a comparison of extremes, but compiling Fury using Bloop is approaching 10x faster than with scalac. Using fsc is closer to Bloop's performance, but still 2-3x slower.
-
Wait, how? You mean on a hot compiler persisted by Bloop, I suppose. I wouldn’t expect any differences when using cold compilers
I should have explained... building Fury is a multiphase process, and I'm invoking scalac over twenty times. Each time it has to start from fresh, loading a monotonically-growing classpath.
-
-
The comparison is with a cold bloop, though.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And the difference between fsc and bloop is basically down to parallelism, I think.
-
Stupid question, what is fsc?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.