Generally speaking, as a solution for amortizing the pains of technical debt, I think it's one of the bluntest, most arbitrary, and most effective rules you could impose.
I read the responses, and nobody has really said it yet, but it's pretty obvious to me that the quality of the software would improve. Some new features might take longer to implement once they're pushing against the limit, but the surface area for bugs would be much reduced.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Code as gold. What a concept!
End of conversation
-
-
-
I agree. But I assume that we would see bugs in the implementation of standards, because we would rather reimplement the part which is relevant to us than using a big library.
-
Maybe it's ill-defined, but I think in this hypothetical scenario, "big" libraries just couldn't exist...
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.