@neva9257 I said 'fairly' balanced as some attempts made to research personal letters vs public persona for evidence? @markowenmartin
-
-
Als antwoord op @DrMel_T
@Dr_Mel_Thomson I think it falls prey to its own critique: cherry-picking. Historical record is pretty clear on F's antics. That said, 1/21 antwoord 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk -
Als antwoord op @neva9257
@Dr_Mel_Thomson I have a history with the author, and have been a critic of his cherry-picking for some time. http://thebrokenspokeblog.wordpress.com/2013/06/07/a-world-of-trouble-untangling-the-politics-and-promise-of-nuclear-power/ …1 antwoord 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk -
Als antwoord op @DrMel_T
@Dr_Mel_Thomson also in trouble for some terrible stuff re: Nicholas Wade. Bad enough to prompt response from Sciam http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/the-curious-wavefunction/2014/05/13/genes-and-race-the-distant-footfalls-of-evidence/ …1 antwoord 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @DrMel_T
@Dr_Mel_Thomson I'm an academic who writes about science writing. Keeping up with these shenanigans is my gift to the world :P1 antwoord 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk -
Als antwoord op @DrMel_T
@Dr_Mel_Thomson yup: I've got a paper on scientists communicating. I'm interested in it as a bioethicist, especially re risk comms2 antwoorden 0 retweets 0 vind-ik-leuks -
Als antwoord op @neva9257
@neva9257 I had the very great pleasure to spend time w@profvrr in the past week in Oz. He is my kind of sci communicator.#realscientist2 antwoorden 0 retweets 1 vind-ik-leuk
RT @Dr_Mel_Thomson @neva9257 I had the very great pleasure to spend time w @profvrr in the past week in Oz, my kind of sci communicator
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.