@SWculek The pangolins are innocent!
Pangolins and the origin of SARS-CoV-2 http://bit.ly/32ev9FH SARS-CoV-2 was not from pangolins, and not from a laboratory - analysis at virology blogpic.twitter.com/yY6XMLxLYg
-
Nieuw gesprek
-
-
-
Also, pangolins are awesome and also don't have any medicinal or magical properties and the Chinese should stop killing them.
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
I still don't buy it... sorry. I want to but...I can't. Yet. Especially not when I found out that China now has closed the lab that disclosed the genome first, orderd all documents destroyed, Xi Jinping around the 18th of januari made security of the BL4 lab a high prio/mandatory
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
1Your two arguments can be interpreted differently: 1) although CoV2 spike uses no previously-identified residues, its binding is even better optimised, 10-20 fold higher than that of SARS-CoV. This just implies that CoV2 maker knew much better than published results and computerpic.twitter.com/GIcPwU3uxW
Deze media bevatten mogelijk gevoelig materiaal. Meer informatie
-
2. SARS-CoV-2 maker engineered the furin cleavage site to enhance infection, but in the meanwhile did not wanted to be detected by other scientists. So to add an extra proline is a evil and effective strategy to cover up the engineering trace.
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
It is reckless, unprofessional, and arrogant as hell to talk like you know it wasn’t from a lab You will have to explain yourself somedayhttps://harvardtothebighouse.com/2020/01/31/logistical-and-technical-analysis-of-the-origins-of-the-wuhan-coronavirus-2019-ncov/ …
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
Not from natural bat, but from artificial bat.pic.twitter.com/2qt1lMzvUV
Deze media bevatten mogelijk gevoelig materiaal. Meer informatie
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
Your arguments that SARS-CoV2 could not be by a lab become groundless and suspicious in light of the result below that CoV2 was de novo synthesised by a very simple method in 1 week. As a scientist with renowned academic reputation, you should retract your manuscript right awaypic.twitter.com/sKbQaQlRxx
Deze media bevatten mogelijk gevoelig materiaal. Meer informatie
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.