Hundreds of millions of people are involved in car accidents every year, most of them don’t die, a small percentage do. That doesn’t mean that car accidents are not dangerous. I’m sure any anti-vaxxer would agree. Why, then, would this logic not apply to infectious disease...
According to Del Bigtree: “They should be allowed to have the measles if they want the measles. “It’s crazy that there’s this level of intensity around a trivial childhood illness.” from https://wapo.st/2Kpu1cd Measles is NOT TRIVIAL. He is LYING!
-
-
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
These people should be done for manslaughter
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
Only if they are willing to pay for their own quarantine and out of pocket medical treatment.
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
Danger, intense rationale ahead! If you follow that, I am also allowed to have syphilis and have unprotected intercourse, because it's my right to do so. Or use explosives in a crowded cinema. Or...do whatever else is harmful to me and the people around me. Just because: freedom.
-
It's dangerous for a German like me to say that, but: "freedom has limits". They are reached as soon as someone else is harmed by my actions. If I recall correctly, deliberate infection with HIV is punishable in court. Why should any other disease be different?
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.