A function of peer review, not provided by @biorxivpreprint is to 'censor' bad (+harmful) science, lending legitimacy to the literature. Do we want to give Peter Duesberg + anti-vaxxers equal access to publishing platfoms, with twitter mobs duking it out over who is 'right'?
It has been suggested by @ACasadevall1 that publishing in biorxiv is all we need - no more journals (at least he suggested that at ASV). I don't think that will happen.https://twitter.com/PaulBieniasz/status/1021815766247792645 …
-
-
-
The legitimacy provided by peer review is far from perfect. But better than crowdsourcing.
- Nog 2 antwoorden
Nieuw gesprek -
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.