No doubt editorial judgement can be imperfect and subjective. Can’t comment on what you heard or are responding to. But your characterization of review process is quite different from what I’ve seen over last two years as AE.
They also complained that they do not have time to thoroughly review submissions. Basically they read abstracts only. And they ask for reviewer suggestions but generally ignore themhttps://twitter.com/theodora_nyc/status/1007301461431156736 …
-
-
-
I’ve been on the board as first AE and then SE since 2009 and this is definitely not true in my experience. BTW I thought you were an editor on
@PLOSPathogens as well@profvrr ?
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
This isn't the way i've seen manuscripts handled during my time as an associate and section editor and it certainly isn't how the editors are told to handle manuscripts.
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
This is absurd!
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.