2/Article lets Facebook off the hook for enabling "dark posts" that can't be verified for FEC compliance. Yet mentions UK compliance issues.
-
-
-
3/When you evaluate CA thru political science criteria it looks different than thru adtech criteria. Total campaign affected voter behavior.pic.twitter.com/iewSKaQS3Z
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
#CambridgeAnalyitica is dangerous b/c it is in hands of folks willing to use it to exploit psych vulnerabilities -
by fanning fears & racial/relig animosity w lies/propaganda. Used in concert w Breitbart news also
#Mercer owned - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Can you be more specific?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
From what I've seen they may not have had the leadtime reqd to fully deploy pychographics for 2016 but seem to have capabilities.
-
And CA seemed to have offered valuable insights to campaign with aggregate data analysis vs hypertargeting.https://twitter.com/profcarroll/status/835591179861389313 …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sans psychogrx CA voter surveillance practice typical but mil pedigree of SCL & ownership of Mercers,Bannon is uniquely concerning.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Important to situate CA/SCL as a single tool in T's "election management" toolchain. Psychogrx can be red herring.pic.twitter.com/BDDGRDPm97
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Indeed. And a firm doesn't need its own individual psychographic database for manipulative targeting; data already available
@profcarrollThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.