PRISMA Statement

@PRISMAStatement

The official reporting guidance on systematic review reporting. For use by everyone preparing a systematic review for publication. Tweets by@LarissaShamseer

International (Ottawa-based)
prisma-statement.org
Registrerte seg mai 2011
16 bilder og videoer Bilder og videoer

Tweets

Du har blokkert @PRISMAStatement

Er du sikker på at du vil vise disse tweetene? Dette vil ikke oppheve blokkeringen av @@PRISMAStatement.

  1. Retweetet
    13. jul.

    They should ask peer reviewers to use reporting guidelines to assess manuscripts

    Journo Q: Recognizing that journos will not become expert in stats/methods, what should they look for in papers to assess cred? Your answer?
    13 retweets 18 liker
  2. Retweetet
    7. jul.

    Get a better meta-analysis. on what to watch out for when summing up research

    36 retweets 48 liker
  3. Retweetet
    27. jun.

    New work on approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews:

    4 retweets 4 liker
  4. Retweetet
    19. mai

    Our blog on trial reporting in 2017, where CONSORT fits & who should do what

    1 svar 29 retweets 16 liker
  5. 11. mai

    Read up on special considerations for protocols of

    Extensions needed of standard systematic rev protocols to accommodate increased complexity of network meta-analysis
    4 retweets 4 liker
  6. Retweetet
    1. mai

    Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias  via

    11 retweets 2 liker
  7. Retweetet
    22. apr.

    Why are accomplished women scientists overlooked as conference speakers? via

    3 svar 75 retweets 49 liker
  8. Retweetet
    19. apr.

    Matthew Page will replace David Moher as our new co-convenor. We welcome to the group

    5 retweets 10 liker
  9. Retweetet
    1. apr.

    Academic institutions should reward this behaviour as part of promotion and tenure.

    Only data sharing is fair PLCO data is available ERSPC data must be made available
    6 retweets 16 liker
  10. Retweetet
    30. mar.

    Earlybird rates close TOMORROW 31Mar for 19-23 June

    2 retweets
  11. Retweetet
    28. mar.

    Laura Arnold's TEDx talk on scientific reproducibility and evidence-based policy:

    1 svar 26 retweets 33 liker
  12. Retweetet
    29. mar.

    New guidance on how to combine qualitative & quantitative evidence in systematic reviews - via :

    23 retweets 18 liker
  13. Retweetet
    28. feb.

    Want to know more about in ? Find out in the OpenTrials journal article:

    30 retweets 21 liker
  14. Retweetet
    25. mar.

    Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions

    15 retweets 10 liker
  15. Retweetet
    21. mar.

    How does this affect reviews and should systematic reviewers be concerned?

    Predator. Tell tale signs of a dodgy journal summarised in
    3 retweets 1 liker
  16. Retweetet
    21. mar.

    Predator. Tell tale signs of a dodgy journal summarised in

    2 svar 24 retweets 14 liker
  17. Retweetet
    10. mar.

    When you plan your systematic review, write up the protocol for publication using the -P guideline:

    58 retweets 38 liker
  18. Retweetet
    15. feb.

    Read what , Altman, & Schulz have to say about undocumented outcome switching in trials & journal standards:

    17 retweets 7 liker
  19. Retweetet
    1. feb.

    Great video about replication and reproducibility (problems) in science here!

    What Makes Science True? Great video by :
    11 retweets 2 liker
  20. Retweetet
    13. okt. 2016

    Hot off the press! The ROBINS-I tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions

    , , og
    1 svar 51 retweets 41 liker

@PRISMAStatement har ikke Tweetet enda.

Lastingen ser ut til å ta sin tid.

Twitter kan være overbelastet, eller det kan ha oppstått et midlertidig problem. Prøv igjen, eller se Twitters status for mer informasjon.

    Du vil kanskje også like

    ·