Because it occasionally tends to represent majoritarian tyranny instead of cooperative federalism, and in the case of the US, its neoimperialist ambitions. As Ben Franklin put it, democracy is two wolves and a lamb deciding what to have for lunch.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
At
@wethefifth podcast, they often distinguish btw Majoritarianism and Democracy. I understand it as mob rule vs mobs constrained by rules.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If the demagogue riding the populist wave is "skilled" enough, democracy can be replaced or shifted towards a more authoritarian regime.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Democracy only works if the electorate is not hoodwinked by popular lies. Capitalism also doesn't work without an informed consumer. When liars win everyone else loses
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe we should be more specific about what we mean by "populism". I get the feeling people are talking past eachother.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Very well said.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe they mean a populism that only characterises one side?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Problem is the argument set out here is overdetermined and doesn't use any data to parse the more than four major explanations offered
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Complicated for Twitter, but one can oppose public democracy, while endorsing private democracy. The difference is in the voluntary nature of self-subjecting to majority rule. The trouble with populism is that its an expression of public democracy.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.