Always happy to be read--and in this case, criticized--by @JonahNRO. A few thoughts in response to his thoughtful piece.https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/intellectual-dark-web-bari-weiss/ …
-
Show this thread
-
I take the point about the name (laughed at the line about the baby boomer buying the Harley). The name's not what I would have picked, but also: I'm reporting on the thing. As for the bigger issue Jonah raises: What makes this thing new or different or worthy of a NYT piece?
6 replies 2 retweets 40 likesShow this thread -
After all, Jonah rightly points out, we've seen many groups (neocons) mugged by reality when they've run up against the orthodoxy of their own side. But while the neocons became cons, Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying and others are staying on the left.
3 replies 6 retweets 50 likesShow this thread -
What makes this group different--and interesting, in my view-is that they aren't just people mugged by the left and moving right. It's a bunch of people who disagree on almost every issue and yet are making common cause.
11 replies 25 retweets 189 likesShow this thread -
Maybe there's another group out there where you can find a pro-life religious Jewish conservative debating a Bernie-voting mathematician/finance guy and an atheist who doesn't believe in free will. But I don't know about it.
19 replies 34 retweets 292 likesShow this thread -
It may very well be that ultimately this group either disintegrates or transforms into something more homogeneous. Right now, though, the fact that they are a bit of a pudding without a clear political theme is sort of the point.
30 replies 9 retweets 195 likesShow this thread
Yes. And, nice piece. Also, 'political affiliations' should come at the end of thinking -- after using dozens of theories to examine thousands of facts and hundreds of heart-breaking trade-offs -- not at the beginning.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.