That’s it. I’m no longer identifying as an evolutionary psychologist because I can’t stop the public from associating the field with stuff like this. I honestly can’t tell if he’s serious or trolling anymore.https://twitter.com/primalpoly/status/992538975087747072 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
= the internet
End of conversation
-
-
-
Not to mention that not wearing shoes that are not absurdly horrible looking can provoke casual compliments which can lead to casual conversations which can lead to...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Gosh no Geoffrey, you didn't claim that. Of course you didn't exactly spell out its usefulness either. Not even in the top 50 you say? But that wasn't even my point. Women probably make judgements based on the whole at once, rather than hierarchical partshttps://www.amazon.com/Master-His-Emissary-Divided-Western/dp/0300188374 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well speaking as a guy (your likely demographic ) when you say 'This is a good suggestion', then yes, I would assume this is among the top 50 factors, otherwise why is a supposedly reputable PHD psychologist saying? If it's factor 263 in importance, the article is b.s.
-
And that's ignoring the incel thing at the top. Sure , you're a very angry self hating depressed guy who believes women hate but it's wearing sneakers that's the problem. Don't give social science a bad name.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.