This is incorrect on many levels. 1. Scale. Chimp “war” involves dozens, human nation wars involve millions. Chimps use physical body, see & feel the resource they desire (sex access being one).
-
-
-
Humans - defense contractor/weapon maker, soldier, politician/decision maker all are separate groups, each with very different incentives. Tribal warfare maybe a better comparison, but a gross approximation still.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
That sounds like saying accidents are not driven by cars over speeding in the bicycle lane, but by humans’ desire to get to places... when faced with the suggestion to ban cars in bicycle lanes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“War was always here. Before man was, war waited for him. The ultimate trade awaiting its ultimate practitioner.”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Great example of why many are skeptical about the overreach of evolutionary psychology. How about some circumspection in extrapolating from chimps to humans?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1) Weapons are not an essential component of war. 2) Banning anything requires one or more essential components of war. 3) Peace and war are not mutually exclusive. 4) What if "they" don't want to be a part of "we?”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That must be why Eisenhower called it the Military Sexual Complex.
-
I’ve got serious cognitive dissonance from these two tweets.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Sterilization for all! That should solve it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ban Chimpanzees!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.