When people reply to a tweet with a gif of a pop culture figure making a facial expression as a sort of 'reaction shot', how often is that a valuable contribution to the public discourse?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
fucking always
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Some things need to be mocked
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Rules of social media. https://twitter.com/GodDoesnt/status/695837527878594561?s=19 …
This Tweet is unavailable.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Got a bunch of party poopers here. The context of the .gif can speak volumes and it can be super funny.pic.twitter.com/2e8NNR5xvi
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Depends on what you consider valuable. It's often funny and if you are skimming a thread to get a gist of the different reactions from people it can be better to see an expression than to read its equivalent in writing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Think it was MIT media lab that made the reaction GIF generator a few years back. Thought it was fun for cute personal conversations but painful for public discourse. Although I'm not sure twitter is the optimal platform either but it's the best we have
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That depends on how much one values humor.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.