Here's why it's unconstitutional for Fresno State to even launch an investigation into Randa Jarrar's tweets: a public university can't impose chilling effects on free speech, however odious it may be. If you don't agree, you're free to try to repeal #1A.https://www.thefire.org/coalition-of-civil-liberties-organizations-to-fresno-state-first-amendment-doesnt-have-a-disrespectful-exception/ …
-
I believe pornography caselaw draws a distinction between protected speech and smut. Many forms of speech are criminalized, and those criminal provisions are constitutional. I’m not saying she deserves to be fired but freedom of speech isn’t a speech free for all.
True, but the half dozen 'unprotected' exceptions to #1A are quite narrowly defined, and none of them are releveant to most of these free speech controversies. https://constitutionallawreporter.com/amendment-01/freedom-speech/unprotected-speech/ …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.