Yes. These are the limits. There are very few of them, and they're very narrow: https://constitutionallawreporter.com/amendment-01/freedom-speech/unprotected-speech/ …
Here's why it's unconstitutional for Fresno State to even launch an investigation into Randa Jarrar's tweets: a public university can't impose chilling effects on free speech, however odious it may be. If you don't agree, you're free to try to repeal #1A.https://www.thefire.org/coalition-of-civil-liberties-organizations-to-fresno-state-first-amendment-doesnt-have-a-disrespectful-exception/ …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You can try to repeal
#1A if you don't like it.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think we're in agreement about that, actually. But until then,
#1A rules.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I noticed Twitter doesn't care if she tweets hateful content. Double standard. Twitter will ban Conservative/Libertarian Twitter users for sneezing. There's that.
-
I agree. It's hugely frustrating and unprincipled.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Read. The. Article.
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It's fascinating that you comment on something without having read even the first few paragraphs of it, or understanding even the most basic principles of free speech.
- 16 more replies
-
-
-
What about the tweet giving out a mental health phone number claiming it was hers? That would seem to go beyond
#1A protection. -
Read. The. Article. It addresses that.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.