Geoffrey MillerVerified account

If they involve "contention by force" over speech, then they're properly understood not as legal consequences but as martial consequences. So while it is true that consequences may be imposed, it is important to talk about what consequences are, when imposed by force.

Idi, Idi, Idi Amin Most amazin' man, that's even been He be General, de President, de king of the scene Idi, Idi, Idi Amin https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFeJJAQPiK4 … ..

If I were talking to Idi Amin, I would respond “the United States recognizes the inviolability of heads of state. But not even the President can call off the Special Activities Division”