Excellent idea.
Before supporting military attacks abroad, we should ask 1) will these really do more good than harm, long term, given the history of such interventions? 2) what are the most likely unintended consequences? 3) are our leaders trying to distract us from domestic issues?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
4) to what extend are they mechanisms for transferring public wealth to private hands, via military contracts, arms sales, and control of natural resources?
-
5) Is the proposal rational to begin with? 6) Is there enough ammunition to kill our ego? 7) what was the question again?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I upvote all of this. Well put
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'd swap 1 and 3 round.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
4) are we led by a lunatic?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
4) Why would Assad use chem weapons on innocent children a week after Trump says we’re leaving Syria, which is one of the only things that would keep the US there. 5) Who benefitted the most from this story and have they been investigated? (Army of Islam)https://twitter.com/primalpoly/status/984196653547573248?s=21 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
so basically we should never attack anybody with our military. i fully support such a platform
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
4) Why does anyone ever support attacks abroad?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.